The straight and the narrow
I justify myself by pointing to the fact that I'm not a big picture person. I like to look at the micro view, to notice miniature details and hidden patterns. Which means that I would rather explore and deconstruct all possible points of view from between A to B than to get to know A to Z. This explains my aversion to foreign languages and traveling, along with the above-mentioned observation on taste in friendship.
This narrow-mindedness has the guilt-inducing consequence of a practically non-existent evangelistic record. Yes, I've been bred and indoctrinated in a true-blue Pentecostal church where we're reminded every week to win souls. Yet my navel-gazing nature still clashes with the whole emphasis on an outward focus and outreach. Sometimes I wonder (albeit passingly) what it'll be like to belong to a more introverted denomination.
Anyway, the point that got me thinking about all this was when I told Fergus that he (no, not Fergus) was one non-mel person I could really talk to. He's a phleg-chol.
"So how did you two connect? Was it on the chol level [since I'm a mel-chol]?"It looks like for now, all my posts are going to circle back to this subject no matter where they start out.
"Actually no, not at all. I think it was more mel to phleg."
"How? Phlegs are passive."
"Well, both types are introverted. And phlegs tend to run deep, and depth is drawn to depth."