On grace and the election
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b527f/b527fa21232a0fd8b4f556f82e0bfbd940c903ef" alt=""
So. Is there a place for grace in politics?
By that, I mean that is it possible for a candidate to campaign without having to resort to attacking or ridiculing an opponent? Is it possible for supporters to defend their choices without hurling accusations, name-calling or tearing down?
I haven't seen any evidence to support that so far. It's an environment where people are pitted against each other to determine a winner. To be elected, it's not enough to show that you are worthy for the position. You have to show that other candidates are not worthy, or that you are more worthy than them. So, meters of column inches are devoted to pointing out why the other side is faulty, despicable and contemptible. Every little action that can be construed into a failing is pointed out and expounded on. Build yourself up by putting others down.
When the stakes are high, few people are able to resist trying to win at any cost. But to me, the means by which you win are as important as why you win. I’d even venture to say that it is better to loose on account of being too gracious to use such dirty tactics on your opponent than to win by having to stoop to that level.
I think that a moral victory like that means more than winning that seat.
*
I didn't post the whole of last week. Fail.
2 comments:
hah, don't be too hard on yourself. Unexpected stuff crop up, keeping the entries at bay. Or at drafts.
Maybe you should've followed unc Ed a lil closer. I'm sure you would have found a person who had both moral and seat victory :)
-Charlotte
Post a Comment